Why Most Cyber Security Content Is Hard to Engage With
- Peter Nash

- Apr 27
- 2 min read
Something I’ve noticed working on audio and video content in the cyber security space:
A lot of it is technically very good — but quite difficult to engage with.
That’s not a criticism. It’s a reflection of how complex the subject is, and how much detail often needs to be covered. But it does mean that, in practice, some important ideas don’t land as clearly as they could — especially for non-specialist audiences.
A common example is podcast content. There are plenty of cyber security podcasts with valuable insight, but many follow the same format: two people talking over a remote connection for 40–50 minutes. The expertise is there, but the structure often isn’t doing much to help the listener.
The same applies to video. Explainer content can be accurate and informative, but still difficult to follow if it isn’t shaped around how people actually absorb information.
In both cases, the issue isn’t the content itself — it’s how it’s presented.
Cyber security is a knowledge-heavy field, and the audience is rarely uniform.
You might be speaking to:
technical specialists
senior decision-makers
SMEs working towards Cyber Essentials
or internal teams with varying levels of understanding
Each of those audiences needs something slightly different, but the content often doesn’t reflect that.
What tends to work better is a more structured approach.
In audio, that might mean:
a clear opening that sets context
defined segments or themes
a sense of pace and progression
In video, it often comes down to:
focusing on one idea at a time
using real-world examples
avoiding unnecessary complexity
None of this means simplifying the subject to the point where it loses meaning. It’s more about translating it — keeping the accuracy, but presenting it in a way that people can actually follow and use.
That’s where audio and video production can make a real difference in cyber security.
Done well, it doesn’t just communicate information — it helps people understand it.
Comments